{"id":10378,"date":"2017-10-20T16:09:05","date_gmt":"2017-10-20T07:09:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rihe.hiroshima-u.ac.jp\/?p=10378\/"},"modified":"2017-10-20T16:09:05","modified_gmt":"2017-10-20T07:09:05","slug":"19-2en","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rihe.hiroshima-u.ac.jp\/en\/2017\/10\/19-2en\/","title":{"rendered":"Prof.Hada’s article will be published on “Perspectives on Leadership in Higher Education”"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Prof. Hada’s res\"\"earch article \u201cInternational connections: personal stories and cultural contexts in university partnerships\u201d will be published on Perspectives on Leadership in Higher Education<\/em>\u00a0in January 2018.<\/p>\n

Also,\u00a0The Big bang in Japanese higher education: the 2004 reforms and the dynamics of change<\/em>\u00a0(Eades, Goodman & Hada eds.) was cited by the followings:\n <\/p>\n

\uff11\uff09\u201d\u2026the type the\u00a0Japanese government has been actively promoting since the early 2000s (Eades,Goodman & Hada, 2005;Poole & Chen, 2009;Tsuruta, 2003) but, rather, a global pivot. 3 Accomplishing such a feat in an und\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

Scaffolding excellence: Content-language integration and the development of Japanese \u2018global leaders\u2019
\n Article \u00b7 May 2017
\n Philip MacLellan<\/p>\n

\uff12\uff09\u201d\u2026 move a decade ago in 2004 to privatise the nationals (dokuritsu h\u014djinka) (Christensen 2011; Goodman 2005; Hirowatari 2000; Poole and Chen 2009). Consistent with neoliberal policy trends worldwide, the emph\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

Administrative practices as institutional identity: bureaucratic impediments to HE \u2018internationalisation\u2019 policy in Japan
\n Article \u00b7 Jan 2016 \u00b7 Comparative Education
\n Gregory S. Poole<\/p>\n<\/div>\n